Author: admin
• Sunday, December 13th, 2009

This blog is here for archival purposes only.  My blog has moved to a new domain: www.pentecostalblogger.com.

God bless,

Ryan

• Sunday, May 24th, 2009

How much should a Christian become Jewish?  There are quite a few movements in Christianity today that offer the seeking Christian a simple question:  How close do you want to resemble Apostolic churches of the 1st century?

This is a valid question and I believe is worthy of further discussion. Let me start of by quoting a portion of the New Testament.  In the following excerpt from the Book of Acts, we find a Jewish congregation full of new converts to the Way.  They were attempting to discuss a simple question.  How much of the old law still applies to one who has newly converted to “The Way’ who was not previously born into the Jewish life.

Acts 15 (English Standard Version)

 

Acts 15

The Jerusalem Council

 1(A) But some men came down from Judea and were teaching(B) the brothers, “Unless you are(C) circumcised(D) according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” 2And after Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and(E) debate with them, Paul and Barnabas and(F) some of the others were appointed to go up to Jerusalem to(G) the apostles and the elders about this question. 3So,(H) being sent on their way by the church, they passed through both Phoenicia and Samaria,(I) describing in detail the conversion of the Gentiles, and(J) brought great joy to all(K) the brothers.[a] 4(L) When they came to Jerusalem, they were welcomed by the church and(M) the apostles and the elders, and(N) they declared all that God had done with them. 5But some believers who belonged to(O) the party of the Pharisees rose up and said,(P) “It is necessary(Q) to circumcise them and to order them to keep the law of Moses.” 6(R) The(S) apostles and the elders were gathered together to consider this matter. 7And after there had been much(T) debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that in the early days God made a choice among you,(U) that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear(V) the word of(W) the gospel and believe. 8And God,(X) who knows the heart,(Y) bore witness to them,(Z) by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us, 9and(AA) he made no distinction between us and them,(AB) having cleansed their hearts(AC) by faith. 10Now, therefore, why(AD) are you putting God to the test(AE) by placing a yoke on the neck of the disciples(AF) that neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? 11But we(AG) believe that we will be(AH) saved through(AI) the grace of the Lord Jesus,(AJ) just as they will.”

 12And all the assembly fell silent, and they listened to Barnabas and Paul(AK) as they related what signs and wonders God had done through them among the Gentiles. 13After they finished speaking,(AL) James replied, “Brothers, listen to me. 14(AM) Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take from them(AN) a people for his name. 15And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written,
 16(AO) “‘After this I will return,and I will rebuild the tent of David that has fallen;I will rebuild its ruins,
    and I will restore it,
17that the remnant[b] of mankind(AP) may seek the Lord,
   and all the Gentiles(AQ) who are called by my name,
    says the Lord, who makes these things 18(AR) known from of old.’

 19Therefore(AS) my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who(AT) turn to God, 20but should write to them(AU) to abstain from(AV) the things polluted by idols, and from(AW) sexual immorality, and from(AX) what has been strangled, and from blood. 21For from ancient generations Moses has had in every city those who proclaim him,(AY) for he is read every Sabbath in the synagogues.”

Now this is debatable, but I believe the bible speaks clearly of adding additional requirements once held dearly by the Jewish Christians.  Some have upheld holding to the letter of the Law, even as much as stating that to truly be a Christian you must speak the names in Jewish rather than transliterated Hebrew into Greek and eventually the English language.

Restored name versions of the bible are fine, but I see no need to place a soteriological requirement on it’s use.  If you truly want an Apostolic church, read the book of Acts.  There is a true description of an Apostolic Church.

• Monday, May 04th, 2009

In June, this url will expire and I am going to move my posts to www.pentecostalblogger.com.  Thanks for reading my column!

• Sunday, April 19th, 2009

I’ve created a new blog at pentecostalblogger.com.  Hope you all enjoy it!

God bless,

 

Ryan

• Sunday, April 12th, 2009

OK, so I’m going to go back to the old theme.  Keep on coming back for more surprises! LOL!

• Saturday, April 11th, 2009

I ran across the following article today, and thought I’d share it with you all.  The author, Dr. Samuel C. Gipp Th. D., makes some strong arguments for the translation of Easter here rather than Passover as found in some of the modern translations. 

The Greek word which is translated “Easter” in Acts 12:4 is the word “pascha”. This word appears twenty-nine times in the New Testament. Twenty-eight of those times the word is rendered “Passover” in reference to the night when the Lord passed over Egypt and killed all the firstborn of Egypt (Exodus 12:12), thus setting Israel free from four hundred years of bondage.
    The many opponents to the concept of having a perfect Bible have made much of this translation of “pascha”.
    Coming to the word “Easter” in God’s Authorized Bible, they seize upon it imagining that they have found proof that the Bible is not perfect. Fortunately for lovers of the word of God, they are wrong. Easter, as we know it, comes from the ancient pagan festival of Astarte. Also known as Ishtar (pronounced “Easter”). This festival has always been held late in the month of April. It was, in its original form, a celebration of the earth “regenerating” itself after the winter season. The festival involved a celebration of reproduction. For this reason the common symbols of Easter festivities were the rabbit (the same symbol as “Playboy” magazine), and the egg. Both are known for their reproductive abilities. At the center of attention was Astarte, the female deity. She is known in the Bible as the “queen of heaven” (Jeremiah 7:18; 44:17-25). She is the mother of Tammuz (Ezekiel 8:14) who was also her husband! These perverted rituals would take place at sunrise on Easter morning (Ezekiel 8:13-16). From the references in Jeremiah and Ezekiel, we can see that the true Easter has never had any association with Jesus Christ.
    Problem: Even though the Jewish passover was held in mid April (the fourteenth) and the pagan festival Easter was held later the same month, howdo we know that Herod was referring to Easter in Acts 12:4 and not the Jewish passover? If he was referring to the passover, the translation of “pascha” as “Easter” is incorrect. If he was indeed referring to the pagan holyday (holiday) Easter, then the King James Bible (1611) must truly be the very word and words of God for it is the only Bible in print today which has the correct reading.
    To unravel the confusion concerning “Easter” in verse 4, we must consult our FINAL authority, THE BIBLE. The key which unlocks the puzzle is found not in verse 4, but in verse 3. (Then were the days of unleavened bread… “) To secure the answer that we seek, we must find the relationship of the passover to the days of unleavened bread. We must keep in mind that Peter was arrested during the “days of unleavened bread” (Acts 12:3).
    Our investigation will need to start at the first Passover. This was the night in which the LORD smote all the firstborn in Egypt. The Israelites were instructed to kill a lamb and strike its blood on the two side posts and the upper door post (Exodus 12:4,5). Let us now see what the Bible says concerning the first passover, and the days of unleavened bread.
    Exodus 12:13-18: “And the blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where ye are: and when I see the blood, I will pass over you, and the plague shall not be upon you to destroy you, when I smite the land of Egypt.
    14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a feast by an ordinance for ever.
    15 Seven daysshall ye eat unleavened bread; even the first day ye shall put away leaven out of your houses: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day until the seventh day, that soul shall be cut off from Israel.
    16 And in the first day there shall be an holy convocation to you; no manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat, that only may be done of you.
    17 And ye shall observe the feast of unleavened bread; for in this selfsame day have I brought your armies out of the land of Egypt: therefore shall ye observe this day in your generations by an ordinance for ever.
    18 In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at even ye shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the month at even.”
    Here in Exodus 12:13 we see how the passover got its name. The LORD said that He would “pass over” all of the houses which had the blood of the lamb marking the door.
    After the passover (Exodus 12:13,14), we find that seven days shall be fulfilled in which the Jews were to eat unleavened bread. These are the days of unleavened bread!
    In verse 18 we see that dates for the observance were April 14th through the 21st.
    This religious observance is stated more clearly in Numbers 28:16-18: “And in the fourteenth day of the first month is the passover of the LORD.
    17 And in the fifteenth day of this month is the feast: seven days shall unleavened bread be eaten.
    18 In the first day shall be an holy convocation;ye shall do no manner of servile work therein:”
    In verse 16 we see that the passover is only considered to be the 14th of the month. On the next morning, the 15th begins the “days of unleavened bread.”
    Deuteronomy 16:1-8: “Observe the month of Abib(April), and keep the passover unto the LORD thy God: for in the month of Abib the LORD thy God brought thee forth out of Egypt by night.
    2 Thou shalt therefore sacrifice the passover unto the LORD thy God, of the flock and the herd, in the place which the LORD shall choose to place his name there.
    3 Thou shalt eat no leavened bread with it; seven days shalt thou eat unleavened bread therewith,even the bread of affliction: for thou camest forth out of the land of Egypt in haste: that thou mayest remember the day when thou camest forth out of the land of Egypt all the days of thy life.
    4And there shall be no leavened bread seen with thee in all thy coast seven days; neither shall there any thing of the flesh, which thou sacrificedst the first day at even, remain all night until the morning.
    5Thou mayest not sacrifice the passover within any of thy gates, which the LORD thy God giveth thee:
    6But at the place which the LORD thy God shall choose to place his name in, there thou shalt sacrifice the passover at even, at the going down of the sun, at the season that thou camest forth out of Egypt.
    7 And thou shalt roast and eat it in the place which the LORD thy God shall choose: and thou shalt turn in the morning, and go unto thy tents.
    8 Six days thou shalt eat unleavened bread: and on the seventh day shall be a solemn assembly to the LORD thy God: thou shalt do no work therein.”
    Here in Deuteronomy we see again that the passover is sacrificed on the first night (Deuteronomy 16:1). It is worth noting that the passover was to be celebrated in the evening (vs.6) not at sunrise (Ezekiel 8:13-16).
    In II Chronicles 8:13 we see that the feast of unleavened bread was one of the three Jewish feasts to be kept during the year.
    II Chronicles 8:13: “Even after a certain rate every day, offering according to the commandment of Moses, on the sabbaths, and on the new moons, and on the solemn feasts, three times in the year, even in the feast of unleavened bread, and in the feast of weeks, and in the feast of tabernacles.”
    Whenever the passover was kept, it always preceded the feast of unleavened bread. In II Chronicles 30 some Jews who were unable to keep the passover in the first month were allowed to keep it in the second. But the dates remained the same.
    II Chronicles 30:l5,21: “Then they killed the passover on the fourteenth dayof the second month: and the priests and the Levites were ashamed, and sanctified themselves, and brought in the burnt offerings into the house of the LORD. And the children of lsrael that were present at Jerusalem kept the feast of unleavened bread seven days with great gladness: and the Levites and the priests praised the LORD day by day, singing with loud instruments unto the LORD.”
   
Ezra 6:19,22: “And the children of the captivity kept the passover upon the fourteenthday of the first month. And kept the feast of unleavened bread seven days with joy: for the LORD had made them joyful, and turned the heart of the king of Assyria unto them, to strengthen their hands in the work of the house of God, the God of Israel.”
    We see then, from studying what the BIBLE has to say concerning the subject that the order of events went as follows:
    (1) On the 14th of April the lamb was killed. This is the passover. No event following the 14th is ever referred to as the passover.
    (2) On the morning of the 15th begins the days of unleavened bread, also known as the feast of unleavened bread.
    It must also be noted that whenever the passover is mentioned in the New Testament, the reference is alwaysto the meal, to be eaten on the night of April 14th not the entire week. The days of unleavened bread are NEVER referred to as the Passover. (It must be remembered that the angel of the Lord passed over Egypt on one night, not seven nights in a row.
    Now let us look at Acts 12:3,4: “And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to take Peter also. (Then were the days of unleavened bread.) And when he had apprehended him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people.”
   
Verse 3 shows that Peter was arrested during the days of unleavened bread (April 15-2 1). The Bible says: “Then were the days of unleavened bread.” The passover (April 14th) had already come and gone. Herod could not possibly have been referring to the passover in his statement concerning Easter. The next Passover was a year away! But the pagan holiday of Easter was just a few days away. Remember! Herod was a pagan Roman who worshipped the “queen of heaven”. He was NOT a Jew. He had no reason to keep the Jewish passover. Some might argue that he wanted to wait until after the passover for fear of upsetting the Jews. There are two grievous faults in this line of thinking.
    First, Peter was no longer considered a Jew. He had repudiated Judaism. The Jews would have no reason to be upset by Herod’s actions.
    Second, he could not have been waiting until after the passover because he thought the Jews would not kill a man during a religious holiday. They had killed Jesus during passover (Matthew 26:17-19,47). They were also excited about Herod’s murder of James. Anyone knows that a mob possesses the courage to do violent acts during religious festivities, not after.
    In further considering Herod’s position as a Roman, we must remember that the Herods were well known for celebrating (Matthew 14:6-11). In fact, in Matthew chapter 14 we see that a Herod was even willing to kill a man of God during one of his celebrations.
    It is elementary to see that Herod, in Acts 12, had arrested Peter during the days of unleavened bread, after the passover. The days of unleavened bread would end on the 21st of April. Shortly after that would come Herod’s celebration of pagan Easter. Herod had not killed Peter during the days of unleavened bread simply because he wanted to wait until Easter. Since it is plain that both the Jews (Matthew 26:17- 47) and the Romans (Matthew 14:6-11) would kill during a religious celebration, Herod’s opinion seemed that he was not going to let the Jews “have all the fun “. He would wait until his own pagan festival and see to it that Peter died in the excitement.
    Thus we see that it was God’s providence which had the Spirit-filled translators of our Bible (King James) to CORRECTLY translate “pascha” as “Easter”. It most certainly did not refer to the Jewish passover. In fact, to change it to “passover” would confuse the reader and make the truth of the situation unclear.

Credits as follows: http://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_02.asp accessedon April 11, 2009.  Written by Samuel C. Gipp, Th. D.

• Wednesday, April 01st, 2009

So, you may be wondering about the title of this blog. Then again you may not be wondering at all, but will suffer through this post due to your graciousness! :)

When I originally purchased this url, I had set up a study group forum for Apostolic Pentecostals. Due to the technical nature of the forum categories, and a limited amount of time on my part, primarily because of my work schedule, the forum languished and was eventually deleted by myself.

To salvage the url (after all I paid for the url) and also to try to separate my personal blog from my theological articles, I set up the blog you now see before you. I did this primarily because I felt that most of my readers of my theological posts would be extremely bored by my personal and computing related posts.

• Friday, March 20th, 2009

elohim-0This is my second post in this series. I will be making a page with a table of contents shortly. Perhaps tonight or tomorrow time permitting. As discussed in the previous post, Hebrew words may have a plural morphology, yet mean a singular connotation based on the context in which it is used. For example, in English we have the word sheep. This can mean either a single animal, or a group of sheep and the only way to infer the author’s meaning is by the context of the words around it.

If I said there are many sheep in the pasture, how many am I referring to? Obviously with the usage of are and many, I am speaking of more than one sheep. If I said this sheep is sick, I am refering to a single sheep, rather than a flock.

Here are some other examples of Hebrew words which have a plural morphology and singular connotation:

biuthim- terror, anguish
chaim- life, refreshment
megurim- dwelling place
Mitsrayim- Egypt
teunim- toil, labor
tzaharyim- noon
tsammin- snare, perdition
shekulim- childlessness
urim- enlightenment
Yerushalayim- Jerusalem

A quote from Michael Heiser illustrates the point lucidly:

In the Hebrew Bible, there are roughly 2500 cases where elohim is used as a singular noun denoting the God of Israel (that figure is arrived at on the basis of grammar and logical context). It isn’t a guess.

Genesis 1:1  KJV   In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

In this case elohim is singular because the verb (in red) is 3rd masculine singular in its grammar.

Genesis 1:26-27  TNK  And God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. They shall rule the fish of the sea, the birds of the sky, the cattle, the whole earth, and all the creeping things that creep on earth.”
Elohim (God) is singular because the verb is 3rd masculine singular. So why the plural pronouns “us” and “our”? You know I hold that those speak of the presence of the divine council here. How do I know elohim isn’t the referent? Keep going with the next verse:

TNK   And God created man in His image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

Three times we have a singular verb (create; Hebrew bara’). In verse 26 when we read “let US make mankind in OUR image,” if GOD were speaking [as though referring to himself as a plurality or to a group of the elohim, as though that’s what the word meant], we’d see PLURAL verbs here in v. 27, but we don’t.

Other examples in Genesis all point to a single God with none else beside Him.  Please subscribe to my rss feed to stay updated with future articles.

• Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

There will be a small hiatus in my blogging as I will be deep below the ocean. I’ll try to get a few posts in before I set sail, but in the mean time I hope you’ve enoyed the posts thus far.

Blessings,

Ryan

Category: Uncategorized  | One Comment
• Sunday, March 15th, 2009

Hi all,

I’ve decided to change the theme to a more bland, yet hopefully more readable theme. Let me know if you preferred the other theme.

Category: Uncategorized  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment